As we do every day, we were trying early this morning to pick up as much news as possible, reading the papers, checking Internet sources and data, and watching/listening to the business news from CNBC, Bloomberg TV, and Bloomberg Radio.
This morning, we half heard two quick "outraged" comments which got our attention.
First, that Pres. Obama was saying that "banks have no inherent rights to profits" and that Sen. Dick Durbin was "trying to create a bank run on Bank of America."
Ok, back to these comments in a second, after a brief disclosure statement.
We are far from rabid fans of money center mega-banks, despite having worked with some of the biggest names in the industry over the years.
Their bureaucracy, inefficiencies, internal politics, self-importance, and lack of true concern for consumers largely infuriates us. We also do not think senior management of many financial services firms were ever really taken to task for their roles in the financial crisis, but that is a whole other storyline.
We also generally applaud the "spirit" behind the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, but fear it will get caught up in politics and what will likely be its own inefficiencies.
But, that said, our initial reaction to today's "outrage" by several commentators over comments by Obama and Durbin on BofA's new debit card fee flap was to agree with them. Our thought was "now is the last possible time that the President and Congress should use the banks as whipping boys again, with such fragility all over the industry."
And then we read the real comments both made about BofA proposing a $5.00 monthly fee for consumers using debit cards.
Obama: "You don't have an inherent right just to get a certain amount of profit if your customers are being mistreated, that you have to treat them fairly and transparently."
Durbin: " Bank of America customers, vote with your feet. Get the heck out of that bank (if you do not like the fees).
Now, both of those comments seem fairly reasonable to us. The only argument we might agree with on the critics' side is that it might not be a great time to take these objections public and perhaps they may be handled better in private conversations.
The overall issues of the "fat cat' financial services industry versus the common man is really heating up with the non-stop coverage, at least in the New York area, of the "Occupy Wall Street" protests. But we still haven't really figured out yet what that is all about.
All we know is that Pres. Obama is in a tight spot and taking heat from all corners. Many of his Corporate/Wall St. big donors from the last election are currently sitting on the sidelines. And the anti-Tea Party movement is gaining steam.
According to one source, "Obama has managed to p--s off both his big donor base and his hard-core liberal base on the same financial issues. Not an easy feat to pull off."
Good Trading!
David W. (aka The Underground Trader)
David W’s FlashTrading Service Is Now Live! The service is unique in its approach to trading options: low capital at risk, frequent market commentary based on the futures markets and real-time options trading, not to mention the options insights you can't help but pick up! Try It Today
Remember, you are in control your email alerts! You can receive alerts for more than 25 free research report alerts including: The “10.0” Report, The Insiders Report, ETF Leaders Report, and The Focus List.
Comments
I agree with both Obama and Durbin. The banking system has taken this country down to the bottom of the river and is drowning all of us. I work in Real Estate and I see the pain and disaster these "fatcats" have created. This is an American tragedy.
What ever happened to free will? If you don't like a banks policies, get out . The government has no inherent right to tell any corporation what policies it can introduce as long as it's legal. I'm shocked and appalled that your State of the Markets supports this socialist view point. Good Bye you have just been deleted . I like my financial information from true Capitalists.
Dick Durbin has no right to tell the American people what to do with their money. Obama does not believe in capitalism period. As for the anti-tea party movement, it has always been the liberal press and the democrats because they want bigger government and more taxes for anyone making a dime so they can waste it on give away programs. so that people do not have to work. The tea party is the majority of the American people. Goodby Obama in 2012!!!!








Obama has managed to pi--off a lot of people .