Buffett: My Friends And I Have Been Coddled Long Enough
August 15, 2011
In an op-ed piece in the New York Times Monday, Warren Buffet called on Congress to ask him and other "super-rich" Americans to contribute more to the federal government. Buffett called for the immediate increase in the tax rate for those making more than $1 million a year, and for a new, higher tax bracket for those making more than $10 million — including dividends and capital gains.
Buffett began with, “Our leaders have asked for ‘shared sacrifice.’ But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched.
In an attempt to clarify his point, Buffet went on to explain the special treatment the uber-wealthy can get. “While… most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as “carried interest,” thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they’d been long-term investors.”
Buffett’s primary point was that the super rich actually pay a lower percentage of their incomes to taxes than everyday Americans.
To drill down and bring his point to life, Buffett shared the math on his own tax bill for 2010. “Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent.
If you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your percentage may be a bit lower than mine. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine — most likely by a lot.”
Not surprisingly, President Obama endorsed Warren Buffett's piece. At a town hall event in Cannon Falls, MN, a stop on his three-day bus tour the President said, “He [Buffett] pointed out that he pays a lower tax rate than anybody in his office, including the secretary.”
Buffett also contends that raising taxes on the very richest Americans isn’t going to hurt job growth. “Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends.
I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain.
Buffett then met the conservative argument head on. "And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000... You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation."
Buffett also called on the so-called "Super Committee" of 12 members of congress tasked with $1.5 trillion in deficit cuts not to stop there but to exceed that level, "in order to restore the nation's confidence in Washington."
Buffett said Congress seems bent on protecting him and other wealth Americans from taxes as if "we were spotted owls or some other endangered species," but added they can do their part.
The Oracle of Omaha offered a suggestion for the Super Committee tasked with cutting trillions from the budget deficit. “I would leave rates for 99.7 percent of taxpayers unchanged and continue the current 2-percentage-point reduction in the employee contribution to the payroll tax. This cut helps the poor and the middle class, who need every break they can get.
But for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.”
In conclusion Buffett wrote, "My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice."
Here at StateoftheMarkets.com, we agree with Buffett’s thinking (which is surprising given that most of us are Republicans!). However, we also recognize that the Democrats tend to take Buffett’s argument and attempt to apply it to those Americans who are clearly not mega-rich. It seems to us that there could be a middle ground here.
As always, feel free to add your comments on this topic.
Remember, you are in control your email alerts! You can receive alerts for more than 25 free research report alerts including: The “10.0” Report, The Insiders Report, ETF Leaders Report, and The Focus List.
Comments
2 reasons WB's for the estate tax: 1) he's in the life insurance business http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/12/warren_buffett_robber_baron.html 2) he piles his $ into trusts so the estate tax won't hit him at full force like it does a family farm. It is analagous to his income tax, the bulk of his income is in LT cap gains so he's taxed at a lower rate than someone, eg, his secretary, for whom the bulk of their income is earned and a tiny fraction is LT capital gains. It's not illegal to pay more than required by law, so knock yourself out Warren; send it all. If he did send in 100%, he would pay about about 0.002% of this year's deficit
Let's just do away with all the loop holes and have a flat tax. Bring back the money that has stock piled over seas and only give them the tax holiday if they hire, and build here. OIL is sitting and HAS SHOVEL READY jobs HERE--LET THEM WORK!! Two years of unemployment--who'd want to get a job!! if I'm paid to sit and do nothing--2 million jobs out there--sorry if they are not their favorite jobs--neither is mine! but I only spend what I make....and I pay my mortgage....and I don't have every think I want just what I need.......
Interesting that he mentioned this when he got old and is close to his end of life...
Perhaps it is a grace from God that has caused Mr. Buffet to question the percentage disparity of federal taxation. To Mr. Buffet and anyone else who questions or ponders the disparities of taxation, income, and wealth, I strongly advise them to read what worldwide leaders (who also call themselves Servant of Servants (of God)) have written concerning workers who possess little or no capital and those who have large amounts of capital: The first two or three words of the papal encyclicals, in Latin, is a customary way of referring to them -- Rerum Novarum 1891 Quadragesimo Anno 1931 Divini Redemptoris 1937 Mater et Magistra 1961 Populorum Progressio 1967 Laborem Exercens 1981 Centesimus Annus 1991 Evangelium Vitae 1995 Caritas in Veritate 2009. Although I seriously doubt that the above were considered in fashioning the Fair Tax concept (23% (23/77) on purchases of new items, elimination of ALL other federal taxes, poverty level "prebates", repeal of the XVI (income tax) Amendment) the Fair Tax concept does seem to begin to equitably address the issues discussed in the encyclicals and, is an answer to Mr. Buffet's apparent concerns. Now what do Mr. Buffet's friends say? Thank you.
you cynical posters. mr. buffet gave the same quote "what is wrong w. a country where my secretary pays more than i do in taxes" over 6 years ago. mr. buffet has stated his intention to leave "relatively small amounts to his children", gates as well. david stockman of regan's tax cuts has said the same, w. gusto, "their is a time to raise taxes, and the time is now", "tax cuts are not a religion". interesting that the lst 4 posts are not only skeptical, but sound just like the republican congress. how about a fair share on social security? why stop collecting at $100k? when i pay taxes, i think, great i made $, fortunate. much rather pay taxes than have losses. an eroding middle class, w. increasing gaps between the rich and the poor is a very dangerous policy. when the working class & middle class win, we all win.
If Buffet and his friends are tired of being coddled, all they have to do is send in more money. Why do they have to be told? Why do they need more nanny-ism to do what they think is right?
Under Obama, higher taxes means bigger government. I would gladly pay more tax, if it would reduce the debt.








1. So raise taxes on LLC's and subchapter S corporations-the job generators! 2. Nothing prevents Buffer from paying more. 3. Why is he giving so much to Bill Gates instead of paying taxes. 4. Warren, just sent 90% of the stock you own in Berkshire to the treasury. You're not generating jobs with that.